📖
MetaPoll | Docs
  • Introducing MetaPoll
  • Getting Started
    • Take the MetaPoll tour!
    • FAQs
    • Quickstart Mission
  • MetaPoll User Guide
    • Signing In
    • Adding and Removing DAOs
    • Browsing MetaPolls
      • Filtering MetaPolls by DAO
      • Search and Other Filters
      • Main card
    • Viewing MetaPoll Results
      • Snapshots
      • Options
      • Child Options, Layers, and Navigation
    • Voting
      • Ranked and Unranked Options
      • Ranking and Unranking Methods
      • Casting Your Vote
      • Viewing Vote History
    • Eligible Tokens and Vote Calculation
    • Vote Decay
    • Graduation
  • Authoring MetaPolls
    • Basics of Creating MetaPolls
      • Creating a new MetaPoll
      • Setting up the MetaPoll
      • Creating Options
      • Publishing a MetaPoll
      • Managing your MetaPolls
    • Working with MPTS format
    • Option space design
      • Option Naming Styles: The Abstraction-Precision Trade-off
      • State Change Loop
      • Utility Formats
    • Example MetaPoll types
      • 1. Control Surfaces for Automated Systems
      • 2. Information Sources for Decision-Making
      • 3. Proposal Temperature Checks
      • 4. Proposal Election and Expectation Management
      • 5. Representative Guidance Systems
  • Hypothetical MetaPolls
  • Advanced Topics
    • Decision Spaces
    • Snapshot Data Structure
    • VCIP - Voter Compute Integrity Proof
    • VDIP - Voter Data Integrity Proof
    • Arweave Perma Storage
    • Verkle Trees
    • ZKsnarks
  • Appendix
    • Links
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Authoring MetaPolls
  2. Example MetaPoll types

2. Information Sources for Decision-Making

Not all MetaPolls need to trigger automatic execution. Some of their most valuable applications are as sophisticated information sources that help organizations understand complex preference landscapes.

How It Works

In this model, MetaPolls generate structured preference data that decision-makers can use as an input to their process, without being bound to automatically implement it. This creates a rich information environment while preserving decision autonomy.

Effective information MetaPolls typically:

  • Focus on values and priorities rather than specific actions

  • Explore preference distributions rather than binary winners

  • Track preference evolution over time

  • Provide context for formal proposals

For example, a service provider might use a MetaPoll to understand communication expectations:

title [Service provider communication expectations]

options [

=Frequency

==Daily

==Weekly

==Monthly

==Quarterly

==Semi Annually

==Annually

=Format

==Newsletter

==Video

==Blog

==Podcast

=Detail level

==High

==Medium

==Low

=Tone

==Professional

==Casual

==Playful

==Funny

==Serious

==Ironic

]

The results don't force the provider to adopt any particular communication strategy, but they provide invaluable context about community expectations. The provider can then design an approach that balances community preferences with their own capabilities and constraints.

Other information source applications include:

  • Community value exploration

  • Product feature prioritization

  • Performance feedback mechanisms

  • Stakeholder preference mapping

  • Research direction signaling

Previous1. Control Surfaces for Automated SystemsNext3. Proposal Temperature Checks

Last updated 10 days ago